O’Melveny Worldwide

Sergei Zaslavsky is an antitrust attorney with broad experience in trials, regulatory merger reviews, conduct investigations, antitrust audits, and antitrust counseling. Sergei effectively represents his clients by being both detail-oriented and strategic, and by studying his clients’ businesses to understand how legal questions intersect with marketplace realities. In doing this, he is able to synthesize antitrust doctrine, economics, and facts into advocacy that is both rigorous and intuitive.

Sergei is a veteran of numerous federal trials and arbitration hearings. He has taken the testimony of executives and economic experts and has deposed numerous fact and expert witnesses. Sergei has obtained favorable verdicts for his clients in both bench and jury trials as plaintiff and defendant. In 2019, the National Law Journal named Sergei as a “DC Rising Star,” an award recognizing “the Washington, DC, region’s 40 most promising lawyers age 40 and under.”

In addition to his antitrust expertise, Sergei specializes in legal issues related to the burgeoning generative AI field, advising a major technology company on AI licensing issues and regularly writing and speaking on the issue.

Sergei has a diverse and deep set of experience, having worked on both litigation and regulatory matters, represented both plaintiffs and defendants, and prepared both expert and fact witnesses. Within that broad set experience, however, there are areas where Sergei has developed particular expertise:

  • Merger Litigation. Sergei has taken part in six merger litigations. His accomplishments in this area include:
    • Key member of the O’Melveny AT&T-Time Warner merger trial team that prevailed against the DOJ in what the press has dubbed “the antitrust trial of the century.” The representation received Global Competition Review’s 2018 “Merger Matter of the Year – Americas” award.
    • Represented US Airways in defending the merger with American Airlines against a DOJ challenge. The airlines settled the DOJ suit, allowing the merger to proceed and paving the way for the creation of the world’s largest airline. The representation garnered Global Competition Review’s 2014 “Matter of the Year” award.
    • Played a pivotal part in Honeywell’s challenge to Alarm.com-Icontrol merger, which resulted in favorable settlement for the client. Sergei was the principal drafter of the complaint and the briefing.
  • Two-sided markets. Sergei played a pivotal role in developing, preparing, and presenting the expert case in the US Airways v. Sabre litigation. The 2016 Sabre trial was the first district court case where two-sided platform doctrine played a key role after the Second Circuit’s Amex decision established the modern judicial approach to platform markets, and the 2022 trial was the first case after the 2018 Supreme Court Amex decision where evidence of net two-sided anticompetitive effects was presented to a jury. The O’Melveny team obtained favorable verdicts for its client US Airways in both the 2016 and 2022 trials. Sergei is one of the few lawyers to have both plaintiff and defense-side experience in two-sided market cases, giving him a comprehensive perspective on this important area of antitrust law. In 2023, Sergei published the Platform Antitrust Report, a comprehensive summary of legal developments in the law of two-sided markets.
  • Economic Experts. While Sergei has worked on virtually all aspects of antitrust litigation, he frequently focuses on the economic case. Sergei has taken the testimony of economic experts in federal court; second-chaired the expert presentations in a merger trial, a rule of reason trial on platform MFNs, and an ICC arbitration; and has deposed both economic and non-economic experts.
  • Class Certification. Sergei has experience opposing class certification in antitrust cases in multiple jurisdictions and industries. In North Brevard County Hospital v. C.R. Bard, Sergei defeated class certification in a monopolization case and expunged hundreds of millions of dollars of potential liability. Sergei delivered the winning argument, persuading the district court judge that the class representative failed to present evidence capable of showing injury for any class member, let alone the thousands of hospitals it claimed to represent, and that the class representative was not a typical class member and not an adequate representative of the absent class members’ interests.

In addition to maintaining his busy and successful practice, Sergei is an active member of the antirust bar and regularly contributes thought leadership on cutting edge competition topics. Sergei is a member of ABA Antitrust Law Section Leadership (currently serving as Vice Chair of the Economics Committee) and a founding member of ABA’s Our Curious Amalgam podcast, a weekly program featuring interviews with leading antitrust and consumer protection thinkers and practitioners.

Read More

Get to Know Sergei

Get to Know Sergei

  • Representation of The Walt Disney Company in a series of class action lawsuits against streaming live pay TV subscribers, who allege that Disney’s licensing contracts and policies inflated prices for streaming pay TV packages.
  • Defense of AT&T and Time Warner against DOJ’s challenge of their historic merger. The trial was characterized as a “sweeping victory for AT&T” by The Wall Street Journal. United States v. AT&T Inc., 310 F. Supp. 3d 161, 164 (D.D.C. 2018), aff’d sub nom. United States v. AT&T, Inc., 916 F.3d 1029 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
  • Defense of medical device company C.R. Bard in a tying case against competitor AngioDynamics. AngioDynamics sought over US$135 million (originally over US$260 million) in damages and an injunction forcing Bard to unbundle the technology it developed to help place catheters inside the patient. Following a three-week trial, the jury returned a complete defense verdict, finding that Bard was not liable for tying.
  • Representation of C.R. Bard in a tying class action brought by a hospital customer. Sergei delivered the winning argument in the District Court for the District of Utah, defeating certification and expunging hundreds of millions of dollars in potential liability.
  • Defense of RBC Capital Markets, LLC in a class action involving allegations of collusion to inflate interest rates on bonds, and related California False Claims Act case.
  • Advising a large technology firm on issues related to AI model licensing.
  • Advising a logistics company on AI policies.
  • Advising an AI industry collaboration on antitrust issues.
  • Preparation of key fact witnesses and second-chairing economic experts’ direct and cross examinations in US Airways v. Sabre, an eight-week trial that resulted in a favorable jury verdict and garnered Global Competition Review’s “Litigators of the Week” award for the O’Melveny trial team. US Airways, Inc. v. Sabre Holdings Corp., No. 11 CIV. 2725, 2017 WL 1064709 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2017), remanded, 938 F.3d 43 (2d Cir. 2019). Sergei also helped prepare the economic case for the 2022 retrial that resulted in the first ever jury verdict finding that the defendant monopolized a two-sided market.
  • Defense of a major tech platform in a series of two-sided market monopolization and tying cases brought by various private and government plaintiffs.
  • Defense of US Airways - American Airlines merger.
  • Representation of Global Music Rights in antitrust litigation against the Radio Music Licensing Committee.
  • Defense of cryptocurrency pioneer Roger Ver and software developers in United American v. Bitmain, the first federal antitrust case involving cryptocurrency. The claims were dismissed with prejudice.
  • Representation of Honeywell in a lawsuit to block a merger between two competitors, resulting in a favorable settlement.
  • Representation of Honeywell in its acquisition of Intermec.
  • Representation a major electronics company in a high-stakes ICC arbitration, taking the testimony of high-ranking marketing executives and second-chairing expert examinations.
  • Representation of Sysco in a merger trial against the FTC, where Sergei second-chaired economic experts’ direct and cross examinations.
  • Representation of a Fortune 100 Company in an FTC investigation relating to joint venture agreement and IP licensing issues. FTC dropped the investigation, allowing Sergei’s client to continue its joint venture.
  • Counseling of major clinical laboratory company on licensing issues.
  • Antitrust audit for Fortune 500 petrochemical company.
  • Representation of manufacturer of a weight loss product in an FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection investigation.

Admissions

Bar Admissions

  • District of Columbia
  • Maryland

Education

  • Harvard University, J.D.: magna cum laude
  • Dartmouth College, A.B., Economics: summa cum laude

Honors & Awards

  • Recommended by The Legal 500 US for Civil Litigation/Class Actions: Defense (2023-2024)
  • Selected as one of The National Law Journal’s 2019 “DC Rising Stars”

Professional Activities

Member

  • ABA Antitrust Law Section Leadership

Author / Co-Author

  • “Two Sides to Every Story: Trying and Winning a Two-Sided Market Case,” Antitrust (Spring 2024) (with Ian Simmons and Patrick Jones)

Contributing Author

  • Antitrust Law Developments Update, ABA (2019)

Podcasts

These are illustrative examples; Sergei has co-hosted many additional podcast episodesMerger Review

  • Our Curious Amalgam, “What’s New in US Vertical Merger Enforcement? A Look at the UnitedHealth-Change Merger Decision and Beyond,” Co-Host, ABA (December 12, 2022)

Artificial Intelligence and Big Tech

  • Our Curious Amalgam, “Are Chatbots Protected? Analyzing Whether Section 230 Should Apply to Generative AI,” Co-Host, ABA (May 29, 2023)

Class Actions and Civil Litigation

  • Our Curious Amalgam, “What is the Secret Sauce Behind Developing a Complaint” (interview with Melinda Coolidge) Co-Host, ABA (September 23, 2019)

Labor and Antitrust

  • Our Curious Amalgam, “What’s the Hubbub About No-Poach? Recent Antitrust Enforcement in Labor Markets,” Co-Host, ABA (March 29, 2021)

Global Antitrust Enforcement

  • Our Curious Amalgam, “Too Political or Not Political Enough? A Debate on the Relationship Between Antitrust Enforcement and Democracy,” Co-Host, ABA (May 22, 2023)

US Antitrust Enforcement Policy

  • Our Curious Amalgam, “Are You on Board With Section 8? A New Era of Enforcement Against Interlocking Directorates,” Co-Host, ABA (November 20, 2023)

Speaker

  • “Antitrust Year in Review and What to Expect in 2025,” O’Melveny Webinar (January 2025)